BasinIQ for Oil & Gas M&A
Every acquisition starts with imperfect information.
The buyer receives a confidential dataroom containing well lists, production history, type curves, lease information, maps, well files, operating-cost assumptions, infrastructure notes, and a seller-defined view of the upside.
Some of it is current. Some of it is incomplete. Some of it does not reconcile. And some of it reflects the most optimistic interpretation of the asset.
Your team still has to determine what the asset is worth—and defend that conclusion before the process moves on.
BasinIQ helps oil and gas buyers turn fragmented deal materials into a verified, forecastable, and risk-aware view of the asset. It connects confidential files with public records, production and completion history, buyer assumptions, and SynMax proprietary satellite imagery so evaluators can see where the seller’s story holds up, where it needs verification, and where risk may be hiding.
Move from dataroom access to asset conviction.
[Design note: button] Request an A&D Diligence Demo
The Dataroom Is Not the Asset
A seller’s dataroom is an important starting point. It is not a complete operating picture.
Well lists may not match state records. Production histories may use different normalization methods or omit critical context. Forecasts may depend on assumptions that are not clearly connected to offset performance, spacing, completion design, downtime, or current operating conditions.
The evidence needed to evaluate those issues may be scattered across spreadsheets, scanned reports, maps, public databases, daily operating files, completion records, and legacy documents.
Meanwhile, reservoir engineering, production engineering, land, finance, operations, and executives are reviewing different portions of the package under the same deadline.
That creates more than a research problem. It creates decision risk.
No evaluation team should have to recommend a bid while wondering whether a material well issue, infrastructure discrepancy, or aggressive forecast assumption is still buried somewhere in the files.
BasinIQ Connects the Full Asset Story
BasinIQ gives asset-evaluation teams a shared environment for reviewing what the seller provided, what public records show, what can be observed in the field, and what the buyer needs to verify.
The BasinIQ agentic AI can read confidential deal materials, interpret well-level documents, compare seller claims with public records, connect production and completion history, and validate visible surface infrastructure using SynMax satellite-verified imagery.
This is not generic document summarization.
It is an upstream-trained asset-evaluation workflow designed to help teams determine:
- What is included in the transaction
- Which records agree and which conflict
- Which wells are ready for forecasting
- Which assumptions require technical review
- Which data gaps could affect valuation
- Where operational or infrastructure risk may be understated
- Where credible upside may exist beyond the seller’s presentation
The result is more time spent evaluating the asset and less time spent assembling the evidence.
From Seller Narrative to Verified Asset View
BasinIQ can reconcile the seller package against public and proprietary information to build a clearer picture of the acquisition.
Establish the complete well inventory
Compare seller-provided well lists with state records, production data, permits, well files, and observed activity.
Identify wells that are producing, inactive, shut in, drilled but uncompleted, plugged, or missing a clear status.
Determine forecast readiness
Identify wells with sufficient production, completion, and operating history to support a credible forecast.
Flag wells that require additional engineering review because of missing records, production anomalies, downtime, operating changes, or uncertain completion history.
Test the development assumptions
Evaluate spacing, offset performance, completion design, parent-child exposure, nearby activity, and development timing.
Surface assumptions that may overstate remaining inventory or understate execution risk.
Validate infrastructure and surface conditions
Use satellite imagery to examine visible pads, roads, tanks, batteries, facilities, and other surface development.
Compare what is observable on the ground with the seller’s maps, infrastructure descriptions, and development plans.
Prioritize the risks that can affect the bid
Identify conflicting records, missing files, low-confidence assumptions, production anomalies, and unresolved diligence items.
Show not only what is missing, but why it may matter to reserves, valuation, operations, integration, or bid strategy.
How the Workflow Works
1. Connect the deal package
Provide BasinIQ with approved access to the confidential dataroom, internal assumptions, and relevant asset files.
2. Reconcile the evidence
BasinIQ compares the package with public production, regulatory records, well-level documents, offset activity, and satellite-observed field conditions.
3. Review the decision-ready findings
Your team receives a prioritized view of forecast readiness, material discrepancies, diligence gaps, operational risks, and assumptions that may affect the bid.
Your data remains governed by your approved access and workflow requirements. BasinIQ is designed to complement the systems and processes your evaluation team already uses—not force a replacement.
Questions Your Team Can Ask
BasinIQ helps evaluators investigate the questions that determine whether an acquisition thesis is defensible:
- Which wells are included in the acquisition package?
- Does the seller’s well inventory match public and state records?
- Which wells have missing or conflicting drilling, completion, or production files?
- Which wells are forecast-ready today?
- Which wells require further technical diligence?
- Where does seller-stated production differ from public or historical production?
- Are there decline anomalies, downtime patterns, or operating issues that require review?
- What offset activity could affect remaining inventory or development timing?
- Do the visible pads, roads, tanks, and facilities match the seller’s descriptions?
- Which assumptions create the greatest risk in the seller’s valuation?
- Which data gaps should be resolved before a bid is submitted?
- What findings should be elevated to the investment committee?
Instead of starting with thousands of files, engineers can start with the wells, assumptions, and discrepancies most likely to affect the decision.
These outputs help teams move from fragmented diligence to a shared, decision-ready view of the asset.
Decision-Ready Outputs
BasinIQ can organize its findings into deliverables for technical reviewers, deal teams, executives, and investment committees.
Common outputs include:
- Reconciled well inventory
- Seller-versus-public comparison
- Forecast-readiness assessment
- Production and decline review
- Missing-data and confidence flags
- Satellite and infrastructure validation summary
- Diligence risk register
- Bid-impacting assumptions list
- Asset-evaluation narrative
- Investment committee summary
- Post-close integration watchlist
These outputs give every stakeholder a shared view of what is known, what remains uncertain, and what should happen next.
Why This Matters
In A&D, speed matters. But speed without verification can create expensive blind spots.
A buyer may have only days or weeks to decide whether to advance, bid, renegotiate, or walk. During that window, the team needs more than a polished summary of the seller’s materials.
It needs to know:
- Where the evidence supports the acquisition thesis
- Where the data is incomplete
- Where assumptions may be aggressive
- Where operational conditions could affect value after closing
- Which uncertainties should change the diligence scope or bid
Without that visibility, teams risk spending too much time gathering information while material questions remain unresolved. They may carry questionable assumptions into the forecast, understate integration issues, or discover avoidable problems after the asset has changed hands.
BasinIQ helps teams go deeper without slowing the process down.
Move Faster With Greater Conviction
For buyers, a verified asset view can support:
- Better bid discipline
- More defensible valuation work
- Stronger investment committee materials
- Fewer diligence blind spots
- Clearer negotiation priorities
- A cleaner transition from evaluation to post-close operations
The goal is not simply to summarize the dataroom faster.
The goal is to walk into the bid review knowing which assumptions are supported, which risks remain open, and why the asset is—or is not—worth owning.
Built for the Full Evaluation Team
BasinIQ supports the stakeholders responsible for evaluating, approving, and integrating an acquisition, including:
- A&D and corporate development
- Reservoir engineering
- Production engineering
- Operations
- Finance
- Land
- Executive leadership
- Private equity sponsors
- Asset-evaluation teams
- Investment committees
Turn the Dataroom Into Asset Conviction
The seller has provided its version of the asset.
BasinIQ helps your team build a defensible one.
By connecting confidential deal materials, public records, production and completion history, infrastructure context, internal assumptions, and satellite-confirmed field evidence, BasinIQ gives buyers a clearer view of both opportunity and risk before the bid is submitted.
Understand what you are buying before you decide what it is worth.
Request an A&D Diligence Demo
Not ready for a demo? Request a Sample Asset-Evaluation Output to see how BasinIQ organizes well-level discrepancies, diligence risks, and bid-impacting assumptions.